Saturday 27 May 2017

meltdown

Déjà vu

Meltdown – and it’s not just the weather

In June 1998, Alfred Sant, then Prime Minister, was facing dissent within his own party. By that time several of his key people had already resigned, claiming they could not work with him and ultimately, with cruel irony, it had to be Dom Mintoff himself who did everything in his power to bring the short-lived Labour administration down.  Granted it was Sant who called the early election, but in hindsight, it becomes clear that governing with the Mintoff thorn in his side would have been impossible.

Today, 14 years down the line, we are facing a similar scenario as Prime Minister Gonzi grapples with the turmoil of rebel backbenchers; turmoil which has been brewing ever since the last election.

Although not everyone agrees that the two situations are comparable, I see a lot of parallels. In both cases you have stubborn Prime Ministers who seem to take the wrong advice from a closed circle of people, often to the detriment of the country.  And in both cases, it is the internal criticism and outright mutiny from within which is destroying the party in government.  Meanwhile, the rest of us watch in astonishment as what was once a very united party self-destructs and implodes before our eyes.

Of course, it will be pointed out that the reason the PN backbenchers have rebelled the way they have is that they were not suitably rewarded for their showing at the polls.  But even here I see a similarity – was not Mintoff similarly outraged when, after  standing for election in ’96 and clinching the vote of the hardcore “mintoffjani” , he was then ignored and slighted by Sant?  As for accusations that members of the Opposition as well as supporters have been cheering from the sidelines and egging on both Franco Debono and Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando, well let’s not forget how Net TV fell over themselves to give Mintoff as much airtime as he needed. Suddenly, with the prospect of an early return to government within its grasp, the PN turned its  bête noire into its temporary ‘hero’.

All eyes on Mintoff in 1998 as he holds a press conference (photo taken by Malta Today, used with permission)

The thing is that in politics it often boils down to “use and be used” – and everyone is happy to play along with the game until the hour of reckoning comes. Ultimately, when push comes to shove, whoever has had a hand in getting their party elected (from canvassers to ‘helpers’ to the candidates themselves) expects something juicy in return. Forget serving one’s country, I have long ago concluded that (save for a few exceptions) whoever enters the arena does so out love of power and glory.

In the context of the bombshells we have seen being dropped over the last few weeks another aspect also becomes clear. If you are going to create a mise-en-scène and use a candidate to win an election by highly unethical means, only to drop him when you have achieved your purpose, then don’t be so surprised when that same candidate no longer refuses to play ball.

What has happened is merely Karma catching up with everyone and biting them firmly in the backside.

 

  • C.Zammit

    From what I hear (and this from people who have worked closely with RCC), he is on the whole an asset for Malta but his lack of charm and the tantrums he throws have made him many enemies.

    However what has happened to him is, in my opinion, Daphne Caruana Galizia’s fault. It is known that she is a good friend of his so people whom she has hurt (and these are many and many of them are in no way public figures) may have thought that if they could not get at her they would get at a close friend of hers.

    Cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face may have happened on both sides of this battle field.

  • MARIE BENOIT

    Chemistry and perception have a great deal to do with whether we like a person or not. We may have never met someone but we have slowly built up an idea of what they are like in our subconscious. In the case of public figures this is often the result of what we read about them; how they act; what they write; their interviews and comments and even their photos and of course their circle of friends and fellow conspirators. We build up these perceptions over the years. It is they who would have contributed to this perception and we are often right about them and no amount of PR gurus are going to change this perception.
    Many have never met Mr Cachia Caruana but few seem to be ‘in love’ with him. He may be brilliant, an asset to any organisation and to Malta, a mandarin but he is also a spin doctor and a creator of spin doctors. How can anyone love that? He doesn’t even have a twinkle in his eye.
    Give me a rascal who is simpatico anytime!

Powered by